BREAKING NEWS
- The Judge Al-Mahmood: the Federal Supreme Court supports the Barrister, it’s also rejects his work restraining.
- The Federal Supreme Court: the Civil Status law became constitutional after treating the inheritance matter in 1963.
- From the legal recording divan to State shura council to the state council 1933-1979-2017
- The Federal supreme court: the judge can't be sued and his judgments subject to the methods of challenging
- The Federal Supreme Court: Divorce legislation came as result of its legitimate requirements, the abuse in it requires compensation
- Launching the news in English of the Federal Supreme Court
- The Federal Supreme Court adjudge by the validity of the article (140) of the Constitution
- The Federal Supreme Court issues a judgment about the parliamentary opposition concept
- The Federal Supreme Court: arresting is an exclusive competence of the Judiciary
- 190 thousand visitors for the Federal Supreme Court website within six months
News
The Judge Al-Mahmood: the Federal Supreme Court supports the Barrister, it’s also rejects his work restraining.
The Federal Supreme Court had confirmed the significance of the barristers’ role, it’s pointed that the Iraq Bar Association is a major partner in devoting the justice system and the sovereignty of the law.
The Federal Supreme Court: the Civil Status law became constitutional after treating the inheritance matter in 1963.
The Federal Supreme Court had rejected the challenge which related to the civil status law No. (188) for 1959, it says that the law became constitutional after treating the inheritance matter in 1963
The Federal supreme court: the judge can't be sued and his judgments subject to the methods of challenging
The Federal Supreme Court confirmed that the judge can't be sued, and it drew attention to that his judgments subject to the methods of challenging according to the law
The Federal Supreme Court: the right of defense is guaranteed, and the confidentiality of the investigation is a “temporal procedure”.
The Federal Supreme Court confirmed that making the investigation confidential is “temporal procedure” that related to the security of the community