BREAKING NEWS

Ruling on the unconstitutionality of an article in the Municipal Administration Law that conflicts with "private property".

The Federal Supreme Court decided the unconstitutionality of the article (79/1st) from the law of municipal's administration law No.(165) for 1964, indicating it contradicted the provisions of immunization of private property contained by the constitution. The court spokesman Ayas AL-Samok said '' The Federal Supreme Court held a session headed by the judge Madhat AL-Mahmood and the presence of all judges who are members and it tried two challenges against ICR speaker- being in this capacity-''.


the judge Madhat AL-Mahmood meet the Egyptian ambassador

The head of the Federal Supreme Court the judge Madhat AL-Mahmood met, in his office on 24/12/2019, the Egyptian ambassador in Iraq Mister Alaa Musa. The judge Madhat AL-Mahmood said'' the Federal Supreme Court is keen on supporting the public freedoms, at the top of the list is the liberty of expression. The court confronted many life decisions through its competence, it issued provisions based on the Constitution in text and content.


The Federal Supreme Court issues a constitutional ruling about the wage of trespassing on the Mortmain’s estates

The Federal Supreme Court issued a constitutional ruling about the trespassing on the Mortmain’s estates, and the amount of the comparable wage resulting from that, noting that the legislator has particulate it with a provisions that differ from other estates because it is relate to the rights of Sharia, belief and the rights of the beneficiaries of it.


The approval of the accused militant’s principal to execute the arrest order issued against him are not contradicts with the provisions of the Constitution.

  The Federal Supreme Court during its session dated on 14.10.2019 ruled with no contradictions between the provisions of the clauses (2nd) and (3rd) of the article (19) of the military criminal procedure law number (22) for 2016 and the provisions of the articles (19/1st & 3rd & 6th &14) of the Constitution.  


Adjudge with impossibility of those whom suited with a crime against honor or corruption to participate in the elections, even if they were included with amnesty

The Federal Supreme Court ruled that the candidate sentenced by a final judicial decision for a felony or misdemeanor of honor, including cases of financial and administrative corruption, cannot participate in the elections, pointing out that his inclusion in the general amnesty does not negate a characteristic that does not suit the public responsibility to occupy a position in the state.


The Federal Supreme Court: Divorce legislation came as result of its legitimate requirements, the abuse in it requires compensation

The federal supreme court has ensured that the legislation of the divorce permission came as result of its legitimate requirements, pointing out that the abuse of the husband in the use of this permission requires compensation, indicating that this approach does not violate the principles of the provisions of Islam as it seeks justice within the family as it is the core of society.